Menu for Mineral Resources of the United States - Calendar Year 1902 :
Introduction & Acknowledgments, by David T. Day, Chief of Division. (pp. 9-10)
Summary of the Mineral Production of the United States in 1902 – 9-39
General Remarks - 11
Structural Materials – 17
Abrasive Materials – 18
Stone – 665-701
Classification – 666
Production – 667
Value of various kinds of stone produced in 1901 and 1902, by States. (table) – 668-670
Value of granite, sandstone, limestone, and marble used for various purposes in 1901 and 1902. (table) – 671
Value of crushed stone in the United States in 1901 and 1902. (table) – 672
Value of crushed stone produced in the United States in 1901 and 1902, by States. (table) – 672-674.
Imports and Exports of Stone - 674
Granite – 675-680
Value of granite produced in the United States in 1901 and 1902, by States and uses. (table) – 676-679
(The following states are included in this table: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indian Territory, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.)
Value of granite produced in the United States, 1898-1902. (table) – 679-680
(The following states are included in this table: Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indian Territory, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.)
Value of trap rock produced in the United States in 1901 and 1902, by States and uses. (table) – 680
(The following states are included in this table: California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.)
Sandstone – 681-686
(The states listed in this table include: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.)
Value of sandstone production in the United States, 1898-1902, by States. (table) – 685-686
(The states listed in this table include: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.)
Value and uses of bluestone produced in New York and Pennsylvania in 1901 and 1902. (table) - 686
Slate – 687-691
Average annual price per square of roofing slate for the entire country. (table) – 688
Value of slate produced in the United States, 1898-1902. (table) – 689
Exports of slate from the United States, showing ports and customs districts from which and to which sent, from 1893 to 1901. (table) – 690-691.
Marble – 692-694
(The following states are listed in this table: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and “Other States.”
Value of marble, by States, from 1898 to 1902, inclusive. (table) – 693-694
(The following states are listed in this table: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and “Other States.”)
Distribution and value of output of marble in 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, and 1902 among various uses. (table) – 694
Limestone – 695-701
Value of the production of limestone in the United States in 1901 and 1902, by States and uses. (table) – 696-699
Value of limestone, 1898-1902, by States. (table) – 700
Cement - 777-811
Introduction – 777
Portland Cement* – 777
(Footnote A, pp. 777: The entire statistical canvass and compilation of this report has been conducted by L. L. Kimball, of the United States Geological Survey. – D.T.D.)
Production – 777
Production of Portland cement in the United States in 1900, 1901, and 1902. (table) – 778
Development of the Portland-cement industry in the United States since 1890. (table) - 779
Relation of Domestic Production and Consumption to Imports - 780
Comparative production of Portland and of natural-rock cement in the United States and of imports of hydraulic cement, 1890-1902. (table) - 780
Figure 1. Diagram showing relation of domestic production of Portland cement to imports and to total consumption of Portland cement in the United States, by years and by barrels, from 1890 to 1902, inclusive – 781
Comparison of domestic production of Portland cement with consumption of all hydraulic cements, 1891-1902. (table) – 782
Production of Portland cement, with increases each year, 1891-1902. (table) – 782
Natural-rock cement – 782
Production – 782
Production of natural-rock cement in 1900, 1901, and 1902. (table) – 783
Puzzolan or Slag Cement – 784
Production – 784
Slag Cement in Europe – 784
Production of Cement in Canada – 785
Imports – 785
(The following countries are listed in this table: United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Germany, “Other European countries,” British North America, and “Other countries”)
Kiln Report in 1902 – 785
Number, kind, and condition of cement kilns in 1902. (table) – 785
Processes of Manufacture – 786
Review of the Cement Industry in the United States by States, by L. L. Kimball – 789
(The following states are discussed in this chapter on the cement industry in the United States: Alabama, 789; California, 789; Colorado, 791; Illinois, 792; Kansas, 792; Kentucky, 793; Indiana, 793; Maryland, 795; Minnesota, 796; New Jersey, 796; New York, 797; North Dakota, 802; South Dakota, 802; Ohio, 802; Pennsylvania, 804; Utah, 807; Virginia, 808; West Virginia, 808; and “Other States,” which include: Arkansas, 810; Florida, 810; Georgia, 810; Iowa, 810; Missouri, 811; Nebraska, 811; New Mexico, 811; Oregon, 811; Tennessee, 811; Texas, 812; Washington, 812; and Wisconsin, 812.)
Analysis of cement rock near South Riverside, California. (table) – 790
Analysis of Madison County, New York, hydraulic lime, 1821. (table) – 798
Analysis of Lehigh Valley cement rock. (table) – 807
Abrasive Materials, by Joseph Hyde Pratt.
Introduction – 873
Value of abrasives produced in United States during 1900, 1901, and 1902. (table) – 874
Artificial abrasives produced in United States during 19001, 1901, and 1902. (table) – 874
Oilstones, whetstones, etc. – 874
Production – 874
Value of oilstones, whetstones, etc., produced in the United States, 1891-1902. (table) – 875
Imports – 875
Imports of hones and whetstones, 1880-1902. (table) – 876
Exports – 876
Grindstones – 876
Production – 876
Value of grindstones produced in the United States during 1902, by States. (table) – 877
Value of grindstones produced in the United, States, 1880-1902. (table) – 877
Imports – 877
Grindstones imported and entered for consumption in the United States, 1868-1902. (table) – 878
Buhrstones and Millstones – 878
Production – 879
Value of buhrstones produced in the united States, 1880-1902. (table) – 879
Imports – 880
Value of buhrstones and millstones imported into the United States, 1868-1902. (table) – 880